Education, long seen as a keystone of opportunity, is also a bureaucratic balancing act. Nowhere is this more evident than in England’s attendance codes. Among them, Code B—denoting supervised off-site education—has sparked both opportunity and confusion. While online education has become ubiquitous, particularly after the pandemic, its limitations under Code B reveal much about the challenges of reintegration in alternative provision (AP).
For providers offering online education, the law is clear: virtual learning conducted exclusively at home cannot qualify for Code B. The code applies only to education delivered at pre-approved, supervised locations—community centres, AP hubs, or schools themselves. Without such supervision, online sessions default to other attendance codes, such as C for authorised absence or D for dual registration. Though the use of remote learning is not discouraged by the DfE, it is necessary for it to be coded correctly. This was clarified in a recent FAQ session held by the department. Watch Here
Yet, this rigidity in policy has not deterred innovation. Our organisation, an approved AP provider for local authorities across the country, has crafted a reintegration strategy that navigates these constraints while addressing the needs of learners with poor attendance histories.
Reintegration success is assessed through a set of clearly defined metrics, ensuring that the transition back to mainstream schooling is purposeful and sustainable. Our reintegration metric is built on three interconnected elements that together determine a learner’s readiness to transition back into mainstream education. This assessment process examines the learner's curriculum pacing, ensuring that the learner is progressing at a rate comparable to their peers in school, their disposition, drawing on facilitator feedback to gauge emotional readiness and a measure of engagement levels that tracks interactions with content, peers, and facilitators.
These metrics work in concert to ensure learners are not only prepared academically but also socially and emotionally equipped for the demands of mainstream education.
Data from our schools highlights the impact of this model:
Attendance rates: Students who started with less than 20% attendance have risen to an average of 70% by the end of Phase 2.
Academic progress: Quiz scores across core subjects improved by 25%, reflecting better comprehension and engagement.
Social engagement: A 40% increase in learners actively using microphones and cameras during lessons, signalling growing confidence and participation.
Teacher feedback: Facilitators report visible improvements in learners’ enthusiasm and willingness to contribute. One teacher noted, “We’ve seen students transition from reluctant participants to enthusiastic contributors.”
The legal stipulations surrounding Code B—mandating supervised learning environments—present logistical challenges for schools already stretched thin. For students, moving from home-based learning to supervised settings often requires overcoming emotional as well as logistical barriers. Yet, this transition is crucial for sustained reintegration.
Our approach has been to collaborate closely with schools and local authorities, ensuring that learners access pre-approved hubs or school-based spaces. By adhering to rigorous safeguarding policies and providing real-time data tracking for attendance and engagement, we align our services with both educational and legal frameworks.
Despite these successes, challenges remain. The current Code B framework could benefit from greater flexibility, particularly as hybrid learning models continue to evolve. Recognising the value of combining supervised and online learning could make reintegration strategies even more effective, bridging the gap between policy and practice.
Code B carries a significance that goes beyond bureaucratic categorisation; it embodies the education system’s commitment to inclusivity and adaptability for its most vulnerable learners. It is a recognition that traditional models do not serve all students equally and that tailored solutions are essential for those facing barriers to mainstream education. Yet, as the needs of learners evolve, so too must the policies designed to support them. By embracing a blended model—one that combines the structure of supervised settings with the accessibility and flexibility of online education—we can create a pathway that not only bridges attendance gaps but also fosters a sense of belonging and possibility for every learner.
As one school principal succinctly observed, “It’s not just about attendance—it’s about belonging. Reintegration doesn’t just bring students back to school; it brings them back to hope.”
With a focus on collaboration, adaptability, and data-driven strategies, Purple Ruler remains committed to shaping a future where every learner thrives.
Comments